• Look upon it and despair at our inability to offer a direct solution like banning assault weapons – or even magazine sizes.  Instead, we offer “prayer” platitudes or claim it’s “a mental health problem” (which of course we also don’t deal with adequately).

Thank you, Washington Post, for offering this still-sanitized lesson in the reality of the destroyed human lives caused by mass shootings using assault weapons. See:  A rare look at the devastation caused by AR-15 shootings

• I’m with Brian Klaas on this one – he talks about how we have so normalized DJT’s unhinged ravings (and fear amplifying them) that little media attention is given to how much of a threat he is to democracy, the rule of law, and social order.  Read his essay The Case for Amplifying Trump’s Insanity.   An excerpt:

“Bombarded by a constant stream of deranged authoritarian extremism from a man who might soon return to the presidency, we’ve lost all sense of scale and perspective. But neither the American press nor the public can afford to be lulled. The man who, as president, incited a violent attack on the U.S. Capitol in order to overturn an election is again openly fomenting political violence while explicitly endorsing authoritarian strategies should he return to power. That is the story of the 2024 election. Everything else is just window dressing.”

• I just can’t help recommending Matt Levine’s November 20 Bloomberg Opinion piece on who controls OpenAI (and, also excellent, on the not-quite-right “negative emissions” profile of plans to cut trees to burn wood to fuel carbon capture).  Great stuff, Matt (and he quotes from a Ted Chiang essay, another plus!).

• David Wallace-Wells does a pretty good takedown of some of the theses presented in Bethany McLean and Joe Nocera’s“The Big Fail: What the Pandemic Revealed About Who America Protects and Who It Leaves Behind” – especially the ones in the clickbait-titled, New York Magazine excerpted “Covid Lockdowns Were a Giant Experiment. It Was a Failure.” Wallace-Wells often disagrees, and has data to back up his arguments.

• Timothy Lee tries to reduce your AI-induced anxiety in his substack post Why I’m not afraid of superintelligent AI taking over the world.  Basically, he posits that preexisting knowledge, not tokens/training data volume, is a limiting factor, both because of its finite, non fungible nature.  It’s definitely worth reading, though I found it only mildly reassuring. Someone will eventually allow AI to test hypotheses in the real world ad lib, and then it will likely generate its own new knowledge based on empirical results.

• Brittany Trang, writing in Stat, has a very good piece reflecting on the future of Emergency Medicine Residency programs.

• I think Nicholas Kristof’s commentary on the Israeli-Hamas conflict in the NY Times is worth reading: We Are Overpaying the Price for a Sin We Didn’t Commit.  An excerpt:

“Israel faces an agonizing challenge: A neighboring territory is ruled by well-armed terrorists who have committed unimaginable atrocities, aim to commit more and now shelter in tunnels beneath a population of more than two million people. It’s a nightmare. But the sober question must be: What policies will reduce the risk, not inflame it, while honoring the intrinsic value of Palestinian life as well as Israeli life?”

• Joshua Benton discourses on our new U.S. Speaker of the House of Representatives in his Atlantic essay, “Where is Mike Johnson’s Ironclad Oath?”  Another pathetic example of how near-complete abandonment of moral principle is now standard for the republican party.

• Tom Friedman gives a lucid (albeit depressing) presentation of the motivations behind the Israeli response in his NYT piece: Why Israel Is Acting This Way.  What a terrible, no-win situation, with enormous civilian casualties likely.

• Katelyn Jetelina responds to the nutso declarations of Florida’s (politically appointed) “Surgeon General” Joseph Ladapo, who when appearing on Fox News said “With the questions about negative efficacy, the persistence of spike protein, and then the stuff we’ve seen related to thromboembolic events like strokes and cardiac injury, I don’t feel comfortable … recommending [the vaccine] to any living being on this planet.”  Say what?

Jetliner goes through his arguments one by one and concludes, rightfully, that:

“Health policy decisions need to be grounded in an accumulation of evidence that provides a comprehensive picture of reality. He [Ladapo] combines legitimate points with profoundly foolish ones, which muddles the picture, creates a sense of false equivalency, and makes it difficult for the general public to discern the truth.”

In a related article, see differences in mortality data from 3 adjacent counties in 3 different states, each with different approaches to health care and public heath in a well-done Washington Post article by Lauren Weber, Dan Diamond and Dan Keating.